Herpes dating positive singles
Although contended the charge but the court after properly looking at the terms of agreement found a lot of discrepancies.
Amidst a huge uproar from privacy activists the jury found the defendant guilty on the charges of misleading statements and proposed $ 1.5 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages in the tune of $ 15 million.
The problem with the arrangement was that they offered software and database assistance but they didn’t exactly keep a tab on the information that was taken from the website.
So in effect people could have taken any detail and information from the database.
This is done to protect the privacy of the person and this is the standard arrangement done by any website and ever more stringently if it is a herpes dating site.
The whole lawsuit against was based on this simple fact that the information of one of the candidates on the site was posted to another site without prior permission.
But in reality the whole confidentiality mentioned in the agreement was a farce at it shared information with over 1000 third party sites.Their preferred choice of dating is through online dating sites and one such site is is a herpes dating site and is also known as one of the most popular ones among them.The lawyer of the plaintiff went on to say that his client was not aware of that the defendant here was engaged in such activities and it was a gross violation of the right. He simply said that the action performed by the defendant in this instance was like if someone was putting their profiles on Jdate and seeing that somehow their profiles have come up on Christian Mingle and that too without their knowledge.The bigger problem was that these details also included their medical condition that they mentioned in their profiles for